Re: WIP: Make timestamptz_out less slow.

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Make timestamptz_out less slow.
Date: 2015-07-28 21:37:26
Message-ID: CAKJS1f8qG2M81g5amfYkmF=-ib2W4dwtRGZZ+XiKpoBVHvwgTg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 29 July 2015 at 03:25, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> On 2015-07-29 03:10:41 +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> > Have you thought about what to do when HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP is not
> defined?
>
> I don't think it's actually important. The only difference vs float
> timestamps is that in the latter case we set fsecs to zero BC.
>
>
I was also thinking that the % 10 won't work when fsec_t is double.

typedef double fsec_t

Regards

David Rowley

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-07-28 21:38:11 Re: Buildfarm failure from overly noisy warning message
Previous Message Qingqing Zhou 2015-07-28 21:04:50 Re: Planner debug views