Re: Sharing aggregate states between different aggregate functions

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sharing aggregate states between different aggregate functions
Date: 2015-08-04 21:34:23
Message-ID: CAKJS1f8bK5=+qdLh_p=h1N--ia+g6B9G1chXxzfn1g3uHvKehQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5 August 2015 at 03:03, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:

> On 08/03/2015 08:53 AM, David Rowley wrote:
>
>> Attached is a delta patched which is based
>> on sharing_aggstate-heikki-2.patch to fix up the out-dated comments and
>> also a few more test scenarios which test the sharing works with matching
>> INITCOND and that it does not when they don't match.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>
> I committed this, after some more cleanup of the comments. Thanks!
>
>
Great! Thanks for doing the cleanups and committing it.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-08-04 21:35:47 Re: max_worker_processes on the standby
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-08-04 21:11:14 Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers