Re: Sharing aggregate states between different aggregate functions

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sharing aggregate states between different aggregate functions
Date: 2015-08-04 15:03:33
Message-ID: 55C0D445.9090907@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08/03/2015 08:53 AM, David Rowley wrote:
> Attached is a delta patched which is based
> on sharing_aggstate-heikki-2.patch to fix up the out-dated comments and
> also a few more test scenarios which test the sharing works with matching
> INITCOND and that it does not when they don't match.
>
> What do you think?

I committed this, after some more cleanup of the comments. Thanks!

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2015-08-04 15:17:28 Re: FSM versus GIN pending list bloat
Previous Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2015-08-04 14:55:22 Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );