| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers |
| Date: | 2015-08-04 21:11:14 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmobv==grm2gOdHk=njx9DoXDvoK=D0Hen7fHMBdoM34ysw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> On 2015-08-03 PM 09:24, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> OK, sure. But let's make sure postgres_fdw gets a server-level option
>>> to control this.
>>>
>>>
>> For postgres_fdw it's a boolean server-level option 'twophase_compliant'
>> (suggestions for name welcome).
>>
>
> How about just 'twophase'?
How about two_phase_commit?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2015-08-04 21:34:23 | Re: Sharing aggregate states between different aggregate functions |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-08-04 20:55:12 | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |