Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Date: 2019-04-11 03:34:30
Message-ID: CAKJS1f8_3ACVJ6ioQFmxes_rHdChcivKa4cEy_cd-229MZ9=Gg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 00:51, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Just so I don't forget about this, I've added it to the July 'fest.
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/23/2065/

Now that we have 428b260f8, I think the version of this that goes into
master should be more like the attached.

I think the original patch is fine for the back branches.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
docs_partitioning_warning_master.patch application/octet-stream 1.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-04-11 03:55:43 Re: Qestion about .partial WAL file
Previous Message Iwata, Aya 2019-04-11 02:10:24 RE: Contribution to Perldoc for TestLib module in Postgres