Re: crashes due to setting max_parallel_workers=0

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: crashes due to setting max_parallel_workers=0
Date: 2017-03-25 08:51:51
Message-ID: CAKJS1f-jnPUKyeF5OGJPNDtkkqMGUOcK+Yn6qjPzP4bTU04WXg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 25 March 2017 at 13:10, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> while working on a patch I ran into some crashes that seem to be caused by
> inconsistent handling of max_parallel_workers - queries still seem to be
> planned with parallel plans enabled, but then crash at execution.
>
> The attached script reproduces the issue on a simple query, causing crashed
> in GatherMerge, but I assume the issue is more general.

I had a look at this and found a bunch of off by 1 errors in the code.

I've attached a couple of patches, one is the minimal fix, and one
more complete one.

In the more complete one I ended up ditching the
GatherMergeState->nreaders altogether. It was always the same as
nworkers_launched anyway, so I saw no point in it.
Here I've attempted to make the code a bit more understandable, to
prevent further confusion about how many elements are in each array.
Probably there's more that can be done here. I see GatherState has
nreaders too, but I've not looked into the detail of if it suffers
from the same weirdness of nreaders always matching nworkers_launched.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
gather_merge_minimal_fix.patch application/octet-stream 1.1 KB
gather_merge_fix.patch application/octet-stream 6.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2017-03-25 08:55:21 Re: Problem in Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan?
Previous Message Kuntal Ghosh 2017-03-25 08:26:04 Re: exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Tracking wait event for latches)