Re: Some incorrect comments and out-dated README from run-time pruning

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Some incorrect comments and out-dated README from run-time pruning
Date: 2018-10-01 02:35:30
Message-ID: CAKJS1f-JvCH6X1Corc0=4uVFw-G1+6_cz9MsJ5yvwO-=HbRJxQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 28 September 2018 at 09:20, David Rowley
<david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I've noticed that the comments above the PartitionedRelPruneInfo
> struct incorrectly document how subplan_map and subpart_map are
> indexed. This seems to have snuck in on 4e232364033.
>
> Also, while reading the executor README file, I noticed that we
> mentioned that executor nodes are created one for one for each
> corresponding plan node. This is no longer completely true. Some
> Append / MergeAppend subnodes may be skipped when performing run-time
> pruning at executor startup. I thought it might be best to mention
> that in the README.
>
> Patch attached.

Added to the November 'fest.

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/20/1812/

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-10-01 02:49:18 Re: executor relation handling
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-01 02:34:03 Re: pgbench - test whether a variable exists