| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: executor relation handling |
| Date: | 2018-10-01 02:49:18 |
| Message-ID: | 31971.1538362158@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 1 October 2018 at 06:18, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> + for (slockmode = lockmode + 1;
>> + slockmode <= AccessExclusiveLock;
>> + slockmode++)
> So would it not be better to add the following to lockdefs.h?
> #define MaxLockLevel 8
> then use that to terminate the loop.
Good idea, will do.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-10-01 03:34:23 | Re: automatic restore point |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2018-10-01 02:35:30 | Re: Some incorrect comments and out-dated README from run-time pruning |