Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Date: 2018-04-07 04:58:01
Message-ID: CAKJS1f-19j+Kj-C8Oage6P6YkxJAxrOxuvRpzVBKx_sBJogmQg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7 April 2018 at 16:31, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I've not followed this thread/feature at all, but I don't find the
> comments atop partprune.c even remotely sufficient. Unless there's an
> README hidden or such hidden somewhere?

There's not a README file. The comments for partprune.c, do you want
this to explain more about how partition pruning works or how this
patch uses the existing code?

Probably if we need to explain more there about how pruning works then
it should be a fixup patch to 9fdb675fc, no?

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-04-07 04:58:39 Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-04-07 04:46:42 Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning