Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Date: 2018-04-07 05:01:04
Message-ID: 20180407050104.dyc6hihksnkcy2rj@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-04-07 16:58:01 +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On 7 April 2018 at 16:31, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > I've not followed this thread/feature at all, but I don't find the
> > comments atop partprune.c even remotely sufficient. Unless there's an
> > README hidden or such hidden somewhere?
>
> There's not a README file. The comments for partprune.c, do you want
> this to explain more about how partition pruning works or how this
> patch uses the existing code?

Primarily the first. This isn't trivial straightforward code.

> Probably if we need to explain more there about how pruning works then
> it should be a fixup patch to 9fdb675fc, no?

Yea, it's about that. Sorry for accidentally jumping on the wrong
thread.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message konstantin knizhnik 2018-04-07 05:20:35 Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts
Previous Message Amit Langote 2018-04-07 04:59:50 Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning