On 21 August 2018 at 13:49, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:19:49PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Yeah, we should omit the sequence too. I don't see any principled
>> reason to think that the sequence is interesting on its own.
>
> I was just looking at this issue, or both of you are already on it?
It's already in my head what it should look like, so I can write it,
although it might not appear until tomorrow, as I've reached the end
of my day now.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services