Re: Add docs stub for recovery.conf

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add docs stub for recovery.conf
Date: 2020-11-30 19:13:50
Message-ID: CAKFQuwbw1t0Ozd0+uS=jj0eJw3PnBc8VC+cJLVUoBc9S6GK6ZQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:42 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

>
> The downside is you end up with X-1 dummy sections just to allow for
> references to old syntax, and you then have to find them all and remove
> them when you implement the proper solution. I have no intention of
> applying such an X-1 fix.
>
>
X = 2; seems like a strong objection for such a minor issue. The status
quo seems worse than that.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-11-30 19:15:27 Re: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-11-30 19:09:10 Re: [PATCH] remove deprecated v8.2 containment operators