Re: Rename synchronous_standby_names?

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rename synchronous_standby_names?
Date: 2016-05-31 18:56:39
Message-ID: CAKFQuwaDKpH=kJE7OJJti5=RkaE3COwAJZ4cXrK9dfM1OBm_GA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 5/31/16 1:47 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>
>> Are we going to change synchronous_standby_names? Certainly the GUC is
>> not *only* a list of names anymore.
>>
>> synchronous_standby_config?
>> synchronous_standbys (adjust to correct english if necesary)?
>>
>
> If the existing values are still going to be accepted, then I would leave
> it as is.

​+1
​
David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-05-31 18:57:34 Re: Logic behind parallel default? WAS: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2016-05-31 18:55:08 Re: Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system