| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Rename synchronous_standby_names? |
| Date: | 2016-06-01 00:49:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTWhzKK6eCFOy0CCw6pLugzdMCF6ikkz6t7WjUrcbBgRA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:56 AM, David G. Johnston
<david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/31/16 1:47 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>>
>>> Are we going to change synchronous_standby_names? Certainly the GUC is
>>> not *only* a list of names anymore.
>>>
>>> synchronous_standby_config?
>>> synchronous_standbys (adjust to correct english if necesary)?
>>
>>
>> If the existing values are still going to be accepted, then I would leave
>> it as is.
>
>
> +1
+1. We've made quite a lot of deal to take an approach for the N-sync
that is 100% backward-compatible, it would be good to not break that
effort.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-06-01 00:51:42 | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-06-01 00:47:21 | User demand, and idea, for C-code conversions from JSON arrays to PostgreSQL arrays |