| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: docs: clarify ALTER TABLE behavior on partitioned tables |
| Date: | 2026-01-21 01:09:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZyJNBN+N5Qtcg0aG6ZpOFvQV5m=cALLgv7g3u1Sz-tZw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 1:20 AM Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks again for your review. I have integrated all your edits to v4. Once
> you consider the changes are okay, can you please mark the CF entry [1] as
> Ready for Committer?
>
>
v5 Attached with a delta.
There exists described behaviors in the notes that are being removed that
need to be retained; pertaining to inheritance setups. I put a note in
place of the removals pointing out that when inheritance is being used for
partitioning the rules for partitioned tables apply (implied 'unless
otherwise noted') and that local/independent objects can always be
addressed normally. I then incorporated the notes into the appropriate
sub-command sections. Please give it a sanity check since I'm still
getting my head around all this.
David J.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v5-0001-docs-clarify-ALTER-TABLE-behavior-on-partitioned-.patch | text/x-patch | 32.7 KB |
| v5-0002-delta.patch | text/x-patch | 3.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2026-01-21 02:22:02 | RE: Simplify code building the LR conflict messages |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-01-21 00:41:59 | Re: pg_stat_statements: add missing tests for nesting_level |