| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats |
| Date: | 2022-02-21 16:07:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZu=CA9FXDqiz99dX8EsprH3QuL6nrJORP4WikhYOAf-A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 2:19 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 1:18 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> > > The view name could be pg_stat_subscription_lrep,
> > > pg_stat_logical_replication, or something on those lines.
> >
> > pg_stat_subscription_stats :)
> >
>
> Having *stat* two times in the name sounds slightly odd to me but let
> us see what others think. One more option could be
> pg_stat_subscription_replication.
>
>
Agreed.
pg_stat_subscription_activity
We already have pg_stat_activity (which may be an argument against the
suggestion...)
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2022-02-21 16:11:14 | Re: Reducing power consumption on idle servers |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2022-02-21 16:03:51 | Re: postgres_fdw: commit remote (sub)transactions in parallel during pre-commit |