BUG #19379: Role pg_read_all_data don't allowed read large objects

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "long76(dot)git(at)mail(dot)ru" <long76(dot)git(at)mail(dot)ru>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: BUG #19379: Role pg_read_all_data don't allowed read large objects
Date: 2026-01-15 13:36:35
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZbtoAs1Ew62aC25R1r7i=M1J_3UmCsssidwDn2Xe6XhA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thursday, January 15, 2026, PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:

> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 19379
> Logged by: Misha Shaygu
> Email address: long76(dot)git(at)mail(dot)ru
> PostgreSQL version: 17.7
> Operating system: Kubuntu 24.04
> Description:
>
> My goal: create role for backup any database on server
>
> Steps:
> 1. CREATE USER backup_user;
> 2. GRANT pg_read_all_data TO backup_user;
> 3. pg_dump my_db
> 4. got error to read large object
>
> Following by links
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/predefined-roles.html
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/lo-implementation.html
> "SELECT privileges are required to read a large object" and role
> "pg_read_all_data" grant it, but it don't work!
>
> Please fix it, thanks!
>

The docs you link note that all data is “tables, views, sequences”. Large
objects are not listed. Maybe that means the name is a bit misleading but
it’s working as documented.

Likewise, the LO page doesn’t say anything about read all being applicable.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2026-01-15 13:45:40 Re: BUG #19379: Role pg_read_all_data don't allowed read large objects
Previous Message PG Bug reporting form 2026-01-15 11:57:14 BUG #19379: Role pg_read_all_data don't allowed read large objects