| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly |
| Date: | 2021-07-29 15:39:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZar1nzJ=iLaepkajmdr1W6O+GfSmS0k4qp0=pi=Nn45A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 8:36 AM Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> I have an issue with the fragment "whether they are from contrib" - my
>> understanding at this point is that because of the way we package and
>> version contrib it should not be necessary to copy those shared object
>> files from the old to the new server (maybe, just maybe, with a
>> qualification that you are upgrading between two versions that were in
>> support during the same time period).
>>
>
> Just to clarify. In no case are binaries copied from the old server to the
> new server. Whether from contrib or otherwise.
>
>
I had used "binaries" when I should have written "shared object files". I
just imagine a DLL as being a binary file so it seems accurate but we use
the term differently I suppose?
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-07-29 15:40:27 | Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2021-07-29 15:36:19 | Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly |