| From: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly |
| Date: | 2021-07-29 15:36:19 |
| Message-ID: | CADK3HHJtWQCjbQns2WkrirnAWR7YEP-LjpH5Gup0gf4+P=sH4A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I have an issue with the fragment "whether they are from contrib" - my
> understanding at this point is that because of the way we package and
> version contrib it should not be necessary to copy those shared object
> files from the old to the new server (maybe, just maybe, with a
> qualification that you are upgrading between two versions that were in
> support during the same time period).
>
Just to clarify. In no case are binaries copied from the old server to the
new server. Whether from contrib or otherwise.
Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2021-07-29 15:39:32 | Re: pg_upgrade does not upgrade pg_stat_statements properly |
| Previous Message | Yura Sokolov | 2021-07-29 15:29:51 | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |