Re: CI: Add task that runs pgindent

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: CI: Add task that runs pgindent
Date: 2025-10-23 15:58:23
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZEnGhGV32A55PvEF9HUhjEfDAoxcp7rDvSNL2KKx8Kdw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 23, 2025, 11:14 Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 8:07 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> > I like the different shape and symbol, but I would probably keep it
> green to
> > indicate that it's informational rather than actionable. We don't want a
> > flurry of patch re-submissions with only whitespace changes eating CI
> resources
> > when the previous build was successful. Just my €0,02.
>
> I strongly agree that this shouldn't signal to the user that they
> really need to fix the problem. I'd like it if this information was
> presented in the least obtrusive way possible. Constantly worrying
> about a misplaced tab is a waste of time for all concerned.
>

My thought is to use the new tags feature to add/remove a "Needs
Formatting" tag as the indicator.

David J.

>
>
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla 2025-10-23 16:08:23 Re: Making pg_rewind faster
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-10-23 15:52:14 Re: Git clone over git protocol fails