| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add docs stub for recovery.conf |
| Date: | 2020-11-30 18:31:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYpfCHTGtLeLxzTrt0YUR1BrDEMfbKNf3w_xDQRfR_8SA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:25 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:11:04AM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> > Can we please just address this docs issue? If you don't like my
> solution can
> > you please supply a patch that you feel addresses the problem? Or
> clearly state
> > that you don't think there is a problem, and do so in a way that actually
> > addresses the specific points I have raised about what's wrong with the
> status
> > quo?
>
> If we know there are X problems, and we fix one of them one way, then
> later fix the rest another way, we have to undo the first fix. If you
> don't want to fix all X, then let's wait until someone does want to fix
> them all.
>
>
IMO there is only the original problem with an acceptable solution
presented that can be committed without downside. If that has to be undone
because someone else in the future decides on a different solution that
happens to touch this too, fine, it can be changed again.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-11-30 18:37:36 | Re: Improve handling of parameter differences in physical replication |
| Previous Message | Andrey Lepikhov | 2020-11-30 18:26:23 | Re: Cost overestimation of foreign JOIN |