Re: Releasing in September

From: Marcin Mańk <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Releasing in September
Date: 2016-01-21 11:11:41
Message-ID: CAK61fk5UXG5Af4X3O84BoTiruPrbd46wiT1QFkx8yBGMrrJMJg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> Many people where happy with our consistent releasing major releases in
> September, e.g. 9.0 to 9.3:
>
> Not sure why the commitfest process should be synchronized with the
release process. What if, when the release date comes, the currently
running commitfest (if there is one) gets put on hold, cleanup work is
done, release gets stamped, then commitfest gets resumed for the next
release?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2016-01-21 11:19:12 Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex
Previous Message Dang Minh Huong 2016-01-21 11:05:37 Re: Window2012R2: initdb error: "The current directory is invalid."