Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers

From: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amit(dot)khandekar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
Date: 2016-12-05 05:35:34
Message-ID: CAJrrPGfxYPBPo_BSB7JXw=E5C0h=eSMZgjf2ToMuACatq8wR4w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
wrote:

> On 11/21/16 3:49 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>
>> After going through that experience, I now agree with Kevin: an
>>> > interface where a new SPI interface lets PLs push a named tuplestore
>>> > into the SPI connection to make it available to SQL seems like the
>>> > simplest and tidiest way.
>>>
>> That also offers a handy step on the path toward table-valued
>> variables and pipelined functions, both of which would be _really_
>> nice for PL/PgSQL users.
>>
>
> FWIW, I expect at some point we'd like the ability to index tuplestores as
> well.

Moved to next CF with "waiting on author" status.

Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haribabu Kommi 2016-12-05 05:37:22 Re: Indirect indexes
Previous Message Haribabu Kommi 2016-12-05 05:34:43 Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers