Re: Assert the timestamp is available for ORIGN_DIFFERS conflicts

From: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Assert the timestamp is available for ORIGN_DIFFERS conflicts
Date: 2026-01-22 11:37:31
Message-ID: CAJpy0uCLKRqi0vOJAEGKoOzj6WR32Dxi4mvewjE4_2SE3uEOug@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 12:40 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Dear Shveta,
>
> Thanks for ideas, I prefer first one. Also, pgindent told me that Line blank
> should be before the code comment. PSA the new version.
>

The patch LGTM.

thanks
Shveta

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2026-01-22 11:56:25 Re: commented out code
Previous Message Mihail Nikalayeu 2026-01-22 11:30:00 Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]