| From: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ahmed Et-tanany <ahmed(dot)ettanany(at)aiven(dot)io>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add max_logical_replication_slots GUC |
| Date: | 2026-03-10 06:54:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAJpy0uC3aJzu_1zsaShL0UAy763MuJ3KOBZORb-a842NQ41tpg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 5:10 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:02 PM Ahmed Et-tanany
> <ahmed(dot)ettanany(at)aiven(dot)io> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, that's what I meant.
>
> Would something like max_logical_wal_senders also be needed for your purpose?
> Otherwise, logical replication connections could exhaust max_wal_senders and
> prevent physical replication connections from being established.
>
I could be mistaken, but I haven’t found a way to start a logical
replication stream without a replication slot. A replication
connection and walsender can exist without a slot, for example:
./psql "host=localhost port=5432 user=user1 dbname=postgres
replication=database"
However, converting that connection to logical replication requires a
slot from the max_logical_replication_slots pool. If that pool is
exhausted, the connection cannot be converted — in which case,
wouldn’t a single GUC suffice?
I might be missing something — are you referring to a different scenario?
One possibility is if max_wal_senders is lower than
max_logical_replication_slots, which could exhaust WAL senders for
logical connections, though that would mostly be a configuration
issue. Isn't it?
thanks
Shveta
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jian he | 2026-03-10 07:41:49 | Re: domain for WITHOUT OVERLAPS |
| Previous Message | Chao Li | 2026-03-10 06:43:53 | Re: [PATCH] Support automatic sequence replication |