Re: [PATCH] Add max_logical_replication_slots GUC

From: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ahmed Et-tanany <ahmed(dot)ettanany(at)aiven(dot)io>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add max_logical_replication_slots GUC
Date: 2026-03-10 06:54:59
Message-ID: CAJpy0uC3aJzu_1zsaShL0UAy763MuJ3KOBZORb-a842NQ41tpg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 5:10 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:02 PM Ahmed Et-tanany
> <ahmed(dot)ettanany(at)aiven(dot)io> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, that's what I meant.
>
> Would something like max_logical_wal_senders also be needed for your purpose?
> Otherwise, logical replication connections could exhaust max_wal_senders and
> prevent physical replication connections from being established.
>

I could be mistaken, but I haven’t found a way to start a logical
replication stream without a replication slot. A replication
connection and walsender can exist without a slot, for example:
./psql "host=localhost port=5432 user=user1 dbname=postgres
replication=database"

However, converting that connection to logical replication requires a
slot from the max_logical_replication_slots pool. If that pool is
exhausted, the connection cannot be converted — in which case,
wouldn’t a single GUC suffice?

I might be missing something — are you referring to a different scenario?
One possibility is if max_wal_senders is lower than
max_logical_replication_slots, which could exhaust WAL senders for
logical connections, though that would mostly be a configuration
issue. Isn't it?

thanks
Shveta

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2026-03-10 07:41:49 Re: domain for WITHOUT OVERLAPS
Previous Message Chao Li 2026-03-10 06:43:53 Re: [PATCH] Support automatic sequence replication