| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ahmed Et-tanany <ahmed(dot)ettanany(at)aiven(dot)io> |
| Cc: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add max_logical_replication_slots GUC |
| Date: | 2026-01-29 11:39:42 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwEaBw9dd+Nzb2ETDJ-40nJTo6GRXrG_FcP0rmw3_-qU_Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 10:02 PM Ahmed Et-tanany
<ahmed(dot)ettanany(at)aiven(dot)io> wrote:
>
> Yes, that's what I meant.
Would something like max_logical_wal_senders also be needed for your purpose?
Otherwise, logical replication connections could exhaust max_wal_senders and
prevent physical replication connections from being established.
That said, adding two separate GUC parameters (i.e.,
max_logical_replication_slots
and max_logical_wal_senders) for this purpose doesn't seem like a
great solution,
though...
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2026-01-29 11:42:59 | Re: Auto-tune shared_buffers to use available huge pages |
| Previous Message | Ahmed Et-tanany | 2026-01-29 11:33:28 | Re: [PATCH] Add max_logical_replication_slots GUC |