Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication

From: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Zhijie Hou <houzhijie22(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, saurabh singh <saurabh(dot)singh214(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shvetamalik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Date: 2026-11-04 04:35:06
Message-ID: CAJpy0uB1QsxKThwXLkeQ31CdiK_-o5TeTQXUCNVjd+3d9K5p=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 3, 2026 at 8:07 PM Zhijie Hou <houzhijie22(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Here is the V90 patch set, which addresses the comments we agreed on,
> including Narayanan's latest comment.

Hou-san, the only change I see in 001 is this:

- if (remote_commit_ts > 0)
+ if (remote_commit_ts != 0)

Are there supposed to be more changes (that we missed posting), or is
that the only one? Sorry, it is not clear from the above message what
all changes were supposed to be in the patch.

thanks
Shveta

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sho Ito 2026-11-04 04:53:09 Re: [PATCH v1] psql: Do not complete JSON format for COPY FROM
Previous Message Paul A Jungwirth 2026-11-04 04:27:29 Re: Fix trigger memory leak