Re: Constraint documentation

From: Brad DeJong <bpd0018(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Lætitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com>, coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Constraint documentation
Date: 2018-06-25 23:42:50
Message-ID: CAJnrtnz-duMseR39YtpZspZasb4uLfx55RZKBBA4CThctEo+nQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 25/06/18 17:45, Lætitia Avrot wrote:
> + <note>
> + <para>
> + Check constraint are not designed to enforce business rules across
tables.
> + Avoid using check constraints with function accessing other tables
and

Subject/verb agreement - either "A check constraint is ..." or "Check
constraints are ..." would be appropriate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2018-06-25 23:50:11 Re: Scariest patch tournament, PostgreSQL 11 edition
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-06-25 22:52:46 Re: Scariest patch tournament, PostgreSQL 11 edition