From: | Raj <rajeshkumar(dot)dba09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | kaido vaikla <kaido(dot)vaikla(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | DINESH NAIR <Dinesh_Nair(at)iitmpravartak(dot)net>, Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Patroni set up |
Date: | 2025-07-02 13:54:06 |
Message-ID: | CAJk5AtYux312zJvMb12VcY4sSt68+NV==xQU1uaNo_R+BUWm5Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Then what's the right architecture Kaido
On Wed, 2 Jul 2025, 19:22 kaido vaikla, <kaido(dot)vaikla(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 at 13:19, DINESH NAIR <Dinesh_Nair(at)iitmpravartak(dot)net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In my opinion this 5-node set up is very elaborate and should work ,
>> which is distributed different across different seismic zone (across
>> Mumbai (primary DC) and Chennai (DR site)) . Probably below mentioned
>> parameters were factored when designing the system
>>
>>
>> 1. network latency between Mumbai and Chennai
>> 2. application switch over in case of fail-over and the downtime.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Dinesh Nair
>>
>>
>>
> If Mumbai (primary DC) is down then is down pg+patroni on Chennai.
> etcd quurom is lost
> br
> Kaido
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Raj | 2025-07-02 14:00:31 | Re: Patroni set up |
Previous Message | kaido vaikla | 2025-07-02 13:52:01 | Re: Patroni set up |