| From: | kaido vaikla <kaido(dot)vaikla(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | DINESH NAIR <Dinesh_Nair(at)iitmpravartak(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Raj <rajeshkumar(dot)dba09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Patroni set up |
| Date: | 2025-07-02 13:52:01 |
| Message-ID: | CA+427g8BBEa7ABb1=88_-WML8qu+fpJQ1w3=hgX6V=HAGLBGSA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 at 13:19, DINESH NAIR <Dinesh_Nair(at)iitmpravartak(dot)net>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my opinion this 5-node set up is very elaborate and should work , which
> is distributed different across different seismic zone (across Mumbai
> (primary DC) and Chennai (DR site)) . Probably below mentioned
> parameters were factored when designing the system
>
>
> 1. network latency between Mumbai and Chennai
> 2. application switch over in case of fail-over and the downtime.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Dinesh Nair
>
>
>
If Mumbai (primary DC) is down then is down pg+patroni on Chennai.
etcd quurom is lost
br
Kaido
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Raj | 2025-07-02 13:54:06 | Re: Patroni set up |
| Previous Message | Raj | 2025-07-02 13:43:37 | Re: Patroni set up |