| From: | John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: missing toast table for pg_policy |
| Date: | 2018-07-18 08:13:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAJVSVGXMPzbpoNnBmq5mUDxYcTMVOyuSTAdiTf5XAfB2EfR5tA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/17/18, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> [... digging ...]
> This comes from get_rel_infos where large objects are treated as user
> data. Rather than the comment you added, I would rather do the
> following:
> "Large object catalogs and toast tables are mutually exclusive and large
> object data is handled as user data by pg_upgrade, which would cause
> failures."
Sounds good to me.
-John Naylor
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2018-07-18 08:16:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove pgbench "progress" test pending solution of its timing is (fwd) |
| Previous Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2018-07-18 07:37:37 | Re: [bug fix] Produce a crash dump before main() on Windows |