Re: missing toast table for pg_policy

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: missing toast table for pg_policy
Date: 2018-07-17 09:03:26
Message-ID: 20180717090326.GI3388@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 02:55:07PM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> I didn't dig deeper, since TOAST and the large object facility are
> mutually exclusive so there shouldn't be a toast table here anyway.
> Hope this helps.

[... digging ...]
This comes from get_rel_infos where large objects are treated as user
data. Rather than the comment you added, I would rather do the
following:
"Large object catalogs and toast tables are mutually exclusive and large
object data is handled as user data by pg_upgrade, which would cause
failures."
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2018-07-17 09:09:15 Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists
Previous Message John Naylor 2018-07-17 07:55:07 Re: missing toast table for pg_policy