| From: | Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> |
| Subject: | Re: Adding OLD/NEW support to RETURNING |
| Date: | 2025-06-26 03:04:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAJSLCQ2X1REE9AjP7XY-fdOdaziNW_bZjsbOmoTiDkE23Vzs0g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 7:42 AM Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 at 15:28, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I went over this again in detail and didn't find any problems, so I
> > have committed it. Thanks for all the review comments.
> >
>
> Looking at the doc pages for UPDATE and MERGE, I realise that I missed
> a paragraph in the "Description" section that needs updating.
>
> Patch attached.
At first look this seems right, modulo some typos
+ the old values of the target table's columns are used, but is it also
+ possible to explicity request old and new values. The syntax of the
should be "but it is also" and "explicitly".
Robert Treat
https://xzilla.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2025-06-26 03:18:32 | Re: pg_logical_slot_get_changes waits continously for a partial WAL record spanning across 2 pages |
| Previous Message | Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) | 2025-06-26 03:02:01 | RE: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |