Re: Adding OLD/NEW support to RETURNING

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
Subject: Re: Adding OLD/NEW support to RETURNING
Date: 2025-06-25 13:41:59
Message-ID: CAEZATCUcqADJuapZSjPf2b6hFJ6AGOUwefRvh8Ht3UZoqqw69Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 at 15:28, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I went over this again in detail and didn't find any problems, so I
> have committed it. Thanks for all the review comments.
>

Looking at the doc pages for UPDATE and MERGE, I realise that I missed
a paragraph in the "Description" section that needs updating.

Patch attached.

Regards,
Dean

Attachment Content-Type Size
returning-old-new-doc-fix.patch text/x-patch 1.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry 2025-06-25 13:44:39 Re: IPC/MultixactCreation on the Standby server
Previous Message Sergey Shinderuk 2025-06-25 13:41:46 Re: Read-Write optimistic lock (Re: sinvaladt.c: remove msgnumLock, use atomic operations on maxMsgNum)