Re: Running pg_dump from a slave server

2016-08-17 15:31 GMT+12:00 Sameer Kumar <sameer(dot)kumar(at)ashnik(dot)com>:

>
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:34 AM Patrick B <patrickbakerbr(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I'm using PostgreSQL 9.2 and I got one master and one slave with
>> streaming replication.
>>
>> Currently, I got a backup script that runs daily from the master, it
>> generates a dump file with 30GB of data.
>>
>> I changed the script to start running from the slave instead the master,
>> and I'm getting this errors now:
>>
>> pg_dump: Dumping the contents of table "invoices" failed: PQgetResult()
>>> failed.
>>> pg_dump: Error message from server: ERROR: canceling statement due to
>>> conflict with recovery
>>> DETAIL: User was holding a relation lock for too long.
>>
>>
> Looks like while your pg_dump sessions were trying to fetch the data,
> someone fired a DDL or REINDEX or VACUUM FULL on the master database.
>
>>
>> Isn't that possible? I can't run pg_dump from a slave?
>>
>
> Well you can do that, but it has some limitation. If you do this quite
> often, it would be rather better to have a dedicated standby for taking
> backups/pg_dumps. Then you can set max_standby_streaming_delay and
> max_standby_archiving_delay to -1. But I would not recommend doing this if
> you use your standby for other read queries or for high availability.
>
> Another option would be avoid such queries which causes Exclusive Lock on
> the master database during pg_dump.
>

Sameer,

yeah I was just reading this thread:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/AANLkTinLg%2BbpzcjzdndsnGGNFC%3DD1OsVh%2BhKb85A-s%3Dn%40mail.gmail.com

Well.. I thought it was possible, but as the DB is big, this dump takes a
long time and it won't work.

I also could increase those parameters you showed, but won't do that as I
only have one slave.

cheers