Re: Fix missing semicolon in pl_gram.y for option_value rule

From: shaobo zhang <zshaoo224(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fix missing semicolon in pl_gram.y for option_value rule
Date: 2026-06-09 07:46:42
Message-ID: CAJJDvKTGFCh7LhqfbLESH6sRDAkQdVfFoVND=7-OAAkH8xwXHg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 12:51:47PM +0800, Chao Li wrote:
> > I would not call this a “fix” as it doesn’t fix anything not working
> > today. It is actually a grammar-style cleanup. Since the code being
> > changed is 12 years old, I think this patch is a candidate for v20.
>
> Why do we even need to care about that?
> --
> Michael

Agreed, it's purely cosmetic. If there's no interest in this cleanup,
I'm fine to withdraw it. Thanks both for looking.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Xuneng Zhou 2026-06-09 07:49:50 Re: t/035_standby_logical_decoding.pl might fail on attempt to read wrong timeline
Previous Message Benoit Lobréau 2026-06-09 07:36:41 Re: Logging parallel worker draught