Re: Sourceforge

From: Brent Friedman <4b(dot)friedman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sourceforge
Date: 2015-06-01 04:29:50
Message-ID: CAJDttg9oHASpJh4EJuuF1DmEoyfVjPBVTDfQ+1GOm8ZtrZEU=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

If no one has done this yet, I can check on the mirrors this week.

Brent Friedman

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:

> All,
>
> Based on this:
>
> https://lwn.net/Articles/646118/
>
> ... it would be great if someone could check on the various mirrors of
> PostgreSQL packages on Sourceforge, and make sure that (a) someone from
> our project still owns them, and (b) they're still offering actual
> Postgres downloads.
>
> Overall, I would suggest that we probably want to disable all Postgres
> content mirrors on Sourceforge. We don't really have the spare time to
> maintain them, and this incident shows that that's a bad situation.
>
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
> http://pgexperts.com
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2015-06-01 21:43:33 Re: Sourceforge
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-05-31 20:20:44 Re: Sourceforge