Re: Sourceforge

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Jason Petersen <jason(at)citusdata(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz>, Ned Lilly <ned(at)xtuple(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sourceforge
Date: 2015-05-31 20:20:44
Message-ID: 20150531202044.GB32602@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 2015-05-29 06:43:37 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Maybe. There is a postgresql trademark but.... the ability to enforce it as
> it has never been enforced would be a bit tough.

If it really came to that - and I think it's unlikely - it'd probably be
EDB's trademarks that are violated because they'd probably wrap their
installer.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brent Friedman 2015-06-01 04:29:50 Re: Sourceforge
Previous Message Jason Petersen 2015-05-29 17:49:27 Re: Sourceforge