Re: BUG #18708: regex problem: (?:[^\d\D]){0} asserts with "lp->nouts == 0 && rp->nins == 0"

From: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su
Subject: Re: BUG #18708: regex problem: (?:[^\d\D]){0} asserts with "lp->nouts == 0 && rp->nins == 0"
Date: 2024-11-15 12:53:36
Message-ID: CAJ7c6TP+0MHu7t3QDdXHMf1DW9r56qnyr_7NsTQOB5+pKQEkcg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Hi,

> Well... at least it's consistent with the current naming e.g.
> HASCANTMATCH. I suggest keeping it as is.

Oh I wrote something stupid, HASCANTMATCH is part of the patch.

In any case, IMO the name is OK.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etienne LAFARGE 2024-11-15 14:47:26 Today's Postgres Releases break login roles
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseev 2024-11-15 12:51:08 Re: BUG #18708: regex problem: (?:[^\d\D]){0} asserts with "lp->nouts == 0 && rp->nins == 0"