Re: BUG #18708: regex problem: (?:[^\d\D]){0} asserts with "lp->nouts == 0 && rp->nins == 0"

From: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su
Subject: Re: BUG #18708: regex problem: (?:[^\d\D]){0} asserts with "lp->nouts == 0 && rp->nins == 0"
Date: 2024-11-15 12:51:08
Message-ID: CAJ7c6TMXLaoBB6GmgkkSRH_WoLxqSU_K6ORnw9rP+3JexuKSMQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Hi,

I reviewed, applied and tested patch v2 on Linux x64 and MacOS x64. LGTM.

> I'm not especially in love with the CANTMATCH arc type name, but
> other possibilities such as DUMMY or NOMATCH felt too generic.
> Better ideas anyone?

Well... at least it's consistent with the current naming e.g.
HASCANTMATCH. I suggest keeping it as is.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksander Alekseev 2024-11-15 12:53:36 Re: BUG #18708: regex problem: (?:[^\d\D]){0} asserts with "lp->nouts == 0 && rp->nins == 0"
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2024-11-15 12:22:21 Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall