| From: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example |
| Date: | 2023-06-05 08:15:39 |
| Message-ID: | CAJ7c6TNyAzjCZ=X-ncBEBApQX5yFzBjOa5B_w0LgcLPJN8gqmQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Michael,
Thanks for your feedback.
> + * The order of PushActiveSnapshot() and SPI_connect() is not really
> + * important.
>
> FWIW, looking at the patch, I don't think that this is particularly
> useful.
Fair enough, here is the corrected patch.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0001-Slight-improvement-of-worker_spi.c-example.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | torikoshia | 2023-06-05 08:30:18 | Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query |
| Previous Message | Yugo NAGATA | 2023-06-05 08:05:26 | Re: pgbench - adding pl/pgsql versions of tests |