Redundant/mis-use of _(x) gettext macro?

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Redundant/mis-use of _(x) gettext macro?
Date: 2026-04-01 03:48:08
Message-ID: CAHut+Pvp7jYcaiZ3pXedXgLcWZWDBLXFUK05JtZpGv3Mj=UOjw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi.

As originally reported [1] in the EXCEPT (TABLE ...) thread, I felt
the _() gettext macro is mis-used when it contains nothing but a
quoted format string.

AFAIK the purpose of using gettext (e.g. the "_(x)" macro) is for
marking the string for i18n translation. But there's nothing even to
translate here.

Only 2 examples were found like this. Granted, this is probably not
very harmful, but IMO it's better to patch the mis-use to prevent it
from propagating.

PSA the patch for more details.

======
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPtVaOYVP1R0TOoNh5G9CUBurrP%3D6i7fJCdfWEZiqVCRvw%40mail.gmail.com

Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-misuse-of-gettext-macro.patch application/octet-stream 1.4 KB

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2026-04-01 03:55:53 Re: Skipping schema changes in publication
Previous Message Chao Li 2026-04-01 03:45:08 Re: [oauth] Split and extend PGOAUTHDEBUG