| From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | DOCS: Missing <structfield> tags for some SEQUENCE fields |
| Date: | 2025-11-13 05:17:17 |
| Message-ID: | CAHut+PtpDMUE3Kd1p=1ff9pw2HMbgQCpowE_0Hd6gs5v2pKfQg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
While reviewing the recent patches for SEQUENCE documentation I found
[1] a few more instances where the <structfield> tag should have been
used for some of the sequence fields (per the recent push [2]).
PSA patch v1 to address these.
======
[1] Searched all docs for 'is_called' and for 'last_value'
[2] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/980a855c5c2e21e964a739694e24004f72e03fdf
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v1-0001-Fix-more-structfield-tags.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chao Li | 2025-11-13 05:18:07 | Re: Rename sync_error_count to tbl_sync_error_count in subscription statistics |
| Previous Message | Chao Li | 2025-11-13 05:14:37 | Re: Suggestion to add --continue-client-on-abort option to pgbench |