Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Date: 2022-05-03 23:44:13
Message-ID: CAHut+PsP6WMHeui5WsGbabZqZNj5+hUp=ivxFJLLKD0Zi5QfVw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 5:16 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
...

> Avoiding unexpected differences like this is why I suggested the
> option should have to be explicitly enabled instead of being on by
> default as it is in the current patch. See my review comment #14 [1].
> It means the user won't have to change their existing code as a
> workaround.
>
> ------
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPuqYP5eD5wcSCtk%3Da6KuMjat2UCzqyGoE7sieCaBsVskQ%40mail.gmail.com
>

Sorry I was wrong above. It seems this behaviour was already changed
in the latest patch v5 so now the option value 'on' means what it
always did. Thanks!

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2022-05-04 00:14:48 Re: strange slow query - lost lot of time somewhere
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2022-05-03 23:05:30 Re: [PATCH] Log details for client certificate failures