| From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication | 
| Date: | 2022-09-02 03:15:33 | 
| Message-ID: | CAHut+Ps2RgRGbjj90NGK3xuHgHOP5zD_fuRXMhGNVhLW0T_+zA@mail.gmail.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 7:53 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:33 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
>
> Few comments on both the patches:
> v4-0001*
> =========
> 1.
> Furthermore, if the table uses
> +   <literal>REPLICA IDENTITY FULL</literal>, specifying a column list is not
> +   allowed (it will cause publication errors for <command>UPDATE</command> or
> +   <command>DELETE</command> operations).
>
> This line sounds a bit unclear to me. From this like it appears that
> the following operation is not allowed:
>
> postgres=# create table t1(c1 int, c2 int, c3 int);
> CREATE TABLE
> postgres=# Alter Table t1 replica identity full;
> ALTER TABLE
> postgres=# create publication pub1 for table t1(c1);
> CREATE PUBLICATION
>
> However, what is not allowed is the following:
> postgres=# delete from t1;
> ERROR:  cannot delete from table "t1"
> DETAIL:  Column list used by the publication does not cover the
> replica identity.
>
> I am not sure if we really need this line but if so then please try to
> make it more clear. I think the similar text is present in 0002 patch
> which should be modified accordingly.
>
The "Furthermore…" sentence came from the commit message [1]. But I
agree it seems redundant/ambiguous, so I have removed it (and removed
the same in patch 0002).
> V4-0002*
> =========
> 2.
> However, if a
> +   <firstterm>column list</firstterm> is specified then only the columns named
> +   in the list will be replicated. This means the subscriber-side table only
> +   needs to have those columns named by the column list. A user might choose to
> +   use column lists for behavioral, security or performance reasons.
> +  </para>
> +
> +  <sect2 id="logical-replication-col-list-rules">
> +   <title>Column List Rules</title>
> +
> +   <para>
> +    A column list is specified per table following the table name, and enclosed
> +    by parentheses. See <xref linkend="sql-createpublication"/> for details.
> +   </para>
> +
> +   <para>
> +    When a column list is specified, only the named columns are replicated.
> +    The list order is not important.
>
> It seems like "When a column list is specified, only the named columns
> are replicated." is almost a duplicate of the line in the first para.
> So, I think we can remove it. And if we do so then the second line
> could be changed to something like: "While specifying column list, the
> order of columns is not important."
>
Modified as suggested.
> 3. It seems information about initial table synchronization is
> missing. We copy only columns specified in the column list. Also, it
> would be good to add a Note similar to Row Filter to indicate that
> this list won't be used by pre-15 publishers.
>
Done as suggested. Added a new "Initial Data Synchronization" section
with content similar to that of the Row Filters section.
~~~
Thanks for your review comments.
PSA v5* patches where all the above have been addressed.
------
[1] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/923def9a533a7d986acfb524139d8b9e5466d0a5
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size | 
|---|---|---|
| v5-0002-Column-List-new-pgdocs-section.patch | application/octet-stream | 11.0 KB | 
| v5-0001-Column-List-replica-identity-rules.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.0 KB | 
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-09-02 04:16:05 | Re: test_decoding assertion failure for the loss of top-sub transaction relationship | 
| Previous Message | John Naylor | 2022-09-02 02:49:52 | Re: [PATCH] Optimize json_lex_string by batching character copying |