Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup
Date: 2022-07-03 22:29:03
Message-ID: CAHut+Ps+4iLzJGkPFEatv=+aa6NUB38-WT050RFKeJqhdcLaGA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 12:59 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
...
> > 2.
> > /* ALTER SUBSCRIPTION <name> SET ( */
> > else if (HeadMatches("ALTER", "SUBSCRIPTION", MatchAny) &&
> > TailMatches("SET", "("))
> > - COMPLETE_WITH("binary", "slot_name", "streaming",
> > "synchronous_commit", "disable_on_error");
> > + COMPLETE_WITH("binary", "origin", "slot_name", "streaming",
> > "synchronous_commit", "disable_on_error");
> > /* ALTER SUBSCRIPTION <name> SKIP ( */
> > else if (HeadMatches("ALTER", "SUBSCRIPTION", MatchAny) &&
> > TailMatches("SKIP", "("))
> > COMPLETE_WITH("lsn");
> > @@ -3152,7 +3152,7 @@ psql_completion(const char *text, int start, int end)
> > /* Complete "CREATE SUBSCRIPTION <name> ... WITH ( <opt>" */
> > else if (HeadMatches("CREATE", "SUBSCRIPTION") && TailMatches("WITH", "("))
> > COMPLETE_WITH("binary", "connect", "copy_data", "create_slot",
> > - "enabled", "slot_name", "streaming",
> > + "enabled", "origin", "slot_name", "streaming",
> > "synchronous_commit", "two_phase", "disable_on_error");
> >
> > Why do you choose to add a new option in-between other parameters
> > instead of at the end which we normally do? The one possible reason I
> > can think of is that all the parameters at the end are boolean so you
> > want to add this before those but then why before slot_name, and again
> > I don't see such a rule being followed for other parameters.
>
> I was not sure if it should be maintained in alphabetical order,
> anyway since the last option "disable_on_error" is at the end, I have
> changed it to the end.
>

Although it seems it is not a hard rule, mostly the COMPLETE_WITH are
coded using alphabetical order. Anyway, I think that was a clear
intention here too since 13 of 14 parameters were already in
alphabetical order; it is actually only that "disable_on_error"
parameter that was misplaced; not the new "origin" parameter.

Also, in practice, on <tab> those completions will get output in
alphabetical order, so IMO it makes more sense for the code to be
consistent with the output:

e.g.
test_sub=# create subscription sub xxx connection '' publication pub WITH (
BINARY DISABLE_ON_ERROR STREAMING
CONNECT ENABLED SYNCHRONOUS_COMMIT
COPY_DATA ORIGIN TWO_PHASE
CREATE_SLOT SLOT_NAME
test_sub=#

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-07-03 22:31:29 Re: generate_series for timestamptz and time zone problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-07-03 21:41:31 Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name