Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name
Date: 2022-07-03 21:41:31
Message-ID: 1386216.1656884491@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Thanks for the review, new version attached.

This is marked as Ready for Committer, but that seems unduly
optimistic. The cfbot shows that it's failing on all platforms ---
and not in the same way on each, suggesting there are multiple
problems.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2022-07-03 22:29:03 Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2022-07-03 21:28:34 Re: JSON/SQL: jsonpath: incomprehensible error message