Re: restore_command return code behaviour

From: Jean-Christophe Arnu <jcarnu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: restore_command return code behaviour
Date: 2025-07-28 08:23:07
Message-ID: CAHZmTm3_zOGuXobfBr2Q0r6W7G=S6Yq3cuyDBA5fWZ_8wO7wsw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Le lun. 28 juil. 2025 à 10:01, Jean-Christophe Arnu <jcarnu(at)gmail(dot)com> a
écrit :

> Here's a first version of this tiny doc patch.
>
> Hope this is clear enough.
>

Sorry, the previous version had a bad wording for one file. Please do not
review it. The following version is the correct one.

--
Jean-Christophe Arnu

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-add-details-on-restore-command-return-code-128.patch text/x-patch 1.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2025-07-28 08:41:29 Re: implement CAST(expr AS type FORMAT 'template')
Previous Message Richard Guo 2025-07-28 08:13:45 A performance regression issue with Memoize