Re: restore_command return code behaviour

On friday, 25 jul. 2025 à 09:35, Jean-Christophe Arnu <jcarnu(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote :

> On fri. 25 jul. 2025, 00:01, Jacob Champion <
> jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote :
>
> Here are the places where I think the details should be added :
> - GUC documentation [1]
> - Backup and Restore [2]
>
> The other mention of restore_command does not involve (or require) return
> code details.
> If there are no objections, I'll start writing a patch proposal on Monday.
>
>
> [1]
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/18/runtime-config-wal.html#GUC-RESTORE-COMMAND
> : file doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
> [2]
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-PITR-RECOVERY
> file: doc/src/sgml/backup.sgml
>

Here's a first version of this tiny doc patch.

Hope this is clear enough.
--
Jean-Christophe Arnu