Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types

From: Peter Moser <pitiz29a(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Johann Gamper <gamper(at)inf(dot)unibz(dot)it>, Michael Böhlen <boehlen(at)ifi(dot)uzh(dot)ch>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Anton Dignös <anton(dot)dignoes(at)unibz(dot)it>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types
Date: 2017-02-27 10:21:52
Message-ID: CAHO0eLbEr8SrOs1daWgZguEJa9WUr_LQu40d-fV3v-koDY3EZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2017-02-24 21:25 GMT+01:00 Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>:
> On 2/24/17 6:40 AM, Peter Moser wrote:
>>
>> Do you think it is better to remove the syntax for ranges expressed in
>> different columns?
>
>
> It's not that hard to construct a range type on-the-fly from 2 columns, so
> (without having looked at the patch or really followed the thread) I would
> think the answer is yes.

We discussed and decided to remove the syntax for separate columns.
The patch with "range-types-only" syntax will be send soon.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-02-27 11:17:32 Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators
Previous Message Amit Langote 2017-02-27 10:12:05 Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning